Skip to main content
Unified search: articles, nationwide company names, and robot categories (separate module)
Section content

Performance Levels and SIL: Choosing the Right Safety Integrity

Published: Publisher: Zhilianhai Robotics News

Two frameworks, one idea

ISO 13849-1 uses performance levels (PL a to e) based on category, MTTFd, diagnostic coverage and common cause failure. IEC 62061 uses safety integrity levels (SIL 1 to 3) based on probability of dangerous failure per hour. Both describe how reliable a safety function must be.

TermFrameworkSimplified meaning
PL dISO 13849-1Common target for robot cell safety functions
PL eISO 13849-1Highest level, used where risk demands it
SIL 2IEC 62061 / IEC 61508Broadly comparable to PL d in practice
Category 3/4ISO 13849-1Redundancy and monitoring structure

Where the number comes from

The required PL or SIL is derived from the risk assessment: severity of injury, frequency of exposure, possibility of avoidance. Choosing a level because a competitor used it, or because a component catalogue lists it, inverts the logic and usually results in over-engineering or under-protection.

Validate, do not just calculate

  • Use components with the declared PL or SIL and the correct architecture.
  • Check that the wiring matches the assumed category.
  • Measure the achieved stopping time and separation distances.
  • Record the calculation, the components and the measurements together.

This article is published by the Zhilianhai Robotics News site. Where policies, standards, prices, company capabilities or project status are involved, cross-check the original sources as well.

Back to section

Company information

Company information in this section comes from the Zhilianhai company database. To add or correct company data, go to Company Directory to look up the company, or submit a data verification request via Contact Us; once the company data upload channel opens, this module will handle it.

Latest materials in this section

Discussion and comments